The Daily Nooze

"All the news we deem fit to print"

  • Home
  • politics
  • satire
  • breaking news
  • Archives
  • Show Your Support
  • Opinion
You are here: Home / Archives for Opinion

Trump Is A Luxury The World Cannot Afford

December 24, 2016 By John DeProspo 4 Comments

At a time when the world is becoming increasingly dangerous, the United States elects its most erratic, temperamentally unstable president. When the leadership and steady hand of the world’s greatest power is needed most, Americans choose a loose cannon as their commander in chief.

There are many religious folks out there who are predicting, and praying for, the end of times. With Donald J. Trump’s tiny finger on the nuclear button, they just might get their wish.

This week was particularly alarming. With terrorist attacks in Berlin, Germany and Amman, Jordon, along with a political assassination in Turkey, it does seem that the world is fast going to hell in a hand basket.

Instead of a cool, calm and collected commander in chief, we are about to install an inexperienced, unpredictable, thin-skinned and intellectually incurious con artist as leader of the free world.

Donald Trump, with his consistent anti-Muslim rhetoric, has perhaps done more for ISIS recruitment than just about anyone. And who does he surround himself with? Like-minded advisers.

Trump’s choice as national security adviser, retired Lieutenant General Michael Flynn, has been quoted as saying, “Fear of Muslims is rational.”

Giving the reins of power to a likeable but completely incompetent man didn’t work so well the last time around. No, George W. Bush did not blow up the world (some may dispute that). He just set the stage for a popular demagogue, who has a thing for nuclear weapons, to do so.

It is being said some Congressional Republicans are as fearful of the harm Trump might inflict on the world just as much as everyone else. But they will stick with him as long he allows them to fulfill their wettest dreams… more tax cuts for the wealthy, privatization of Medicare and Social Security, business deregulation, etc.

Once Trump stops playing ball with the legislators, however, they have enough dirt on the ethically compromised “billionaire” to impeach his butt.

But it might be too late. World War III might have already started.

As always, for Republicans, it is party over country… or even the world.

Photo | bossip.com

 

 

 

 

Filed Under: featured, Opinion

Democrats Can’t See The Forest For The Trees

December 22, 2016 By John DeProspo 6 Comments

Nearly one and a half months after their candidate’s defeat, Democrats are still in mourning. They’re in the dumps. They cannot understand how a Hillary victory that was seemingly in the bag ended up as one of the most shocking presidential losses in American history.

The Democratic Party will no doubt conduct a postmortem similar to the one carried out by Republicans after their 2012 loss.

Already there are different theories being floated for this devastating upset. Hillary did not campaign enough in the Rust Belt states. Hillary did not address the economic concerns of the angry white blue-collar male. Hillary forgot about rural America … and so on and so on.

Democrats, save your money.

There is one simple fact that led to your electoral demise. You nominated perhaps the most viscerally hated political candidate in your party’s history. Unfortunately, you got too hung up on the corresponding fact that Hillary was also the most experienced candidate in your party’s history.

For many voters, the 2016 election literally came down to choosing the lesser of two evils.

While many voters (especially evangelical) disliked the Republican candidate and correctly saw him as an immoral, narcissistic, pathological liar, he was not the devil incarnate, Hillary Clinton. With Trump the sinner, there was always the possibility of redemption. That could never have been the case for the Princess of Darkness.

After years of Clinton bashing by conservative media; after years of politically motivated investigations by Congress, there was nothing Hillary could have done, short of walking on water, which would have changed the minds of many Hillary-hating voters.

Yes, the FBI’s illegal actions weeks before the election, along with Russian interference favoring Trump, did not help Clinton’s chances. Nor did voter suppression in many Republican-controlled states.

The simple truth, as much as Democrats hate to admit it, is that voters did not so much vote for Trump as they voted against Hillary.

As one Wisconsin voter, who had previously voted for Obama, told MSNBC’s Chris Hayes at a town hall meeting held last week in Kenosha, “I voted for Trump because he is not Hillary.”

The Democratic Party should not complicate things. Instead, they should heed the wisdom found in the principle of Occam’s razor. The simplest explanation is usually the best.

Photo | downtrend.com

 

 

 

Filed Under: featured, Opinion

Trump’s Strange “Magical Victory Tour”

December 17, 2016 By John DeProspo 4 Comments

trump_crowned_president2-620x412

Despite having won the election, Donald Trump is still out on the campaign trail. Yesterday’s stop was Orlando, Florida. Today’s destination, Mobile, Alabama.

President-elect Trump has ostensibly gone back on the campaign trail to deliver a message of unity after one of our country’s more divisive presidential elections. The strange thing is that Trump’s tour stops have only included those states that helped him magically win the presidency: Ohio, Wisconsin, Michigan, North Carolina, Iowa, Pennsylvania, Florida, and Alabama.

If Donald Trump’s goal is to heal the nation’s wounds, he sure has a funny way of going about it.

At almost every stop, Trump has attacked the press as being “dishonest,” railed against his political opponents (both Democrat and Republican) and gloated over his defeat of Democrat Hillary Clinton.

Trump’s loyalists have greeted his call for togetherness with the same chants heard during the primary season: “Lock her up,” “Build the wall,” and everyone’s’ favorite, “USA… USA… USA!”

Trump’s new road show can best be described has his “greatest hits” tour. Even though he has backed away from some of the songs he sang during the primary campaign, he is smart enough to know you give your audiences what they came to hear.

The “Trumpmania” tour has not disappointed fans. Even though he is re-writing some tunes made popular during the campaign (“The Big Beautiful Wall,” “I’m Locking Up Crooked Hillary”), he is still performing most of his beloved songs (even though they too may be subject to re-write): “I’m Repealing Obamacare,” “Let’s Keep Those Muslims Out,” “Rip, Rip, Rip Up Those Trade Deals” and “Gotta Drain That Swamp.”

Trump groupies are ecstatic about having their pied piper back on tour. It’s been one packed arena after another.

Of course, the fact that Trump has been running ads in those states where he has appeared has helped with turnout. The message? Come to our rally and hear the only man who can take all your troubles away.

“The Magical Victory Tour” is waiting to take you away … take you away, maybe today.

Photo | Reuters/Lucas Jackson/Carlo Allegri/Salon)

 

 

Filed Under: featured, Opinion

Putin Fingerprints All Over U.S. Election Interference

December 14, 2016 By John DeProspo 2 Comments

Russian President President Vladimir Putin holds up a glass during a toast at a luncheon hosted by United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, Monday, Sept. 28, 2015, at United Nations headquarters. (AP Photo/Andrew Harnik)

Surprise, surprise! Today U.S. intelligence officials revealed they believe Vladimir Putin was directly involved in efforts to disrupt our presidential election. Specifically, they have strong evidence that the Russian President, and former KGB spy, oversaw a concerted effort to help Donald Trump get elected president.

To many, this was not news at all.

It was long suspected, prior to the election, that our longtime geopolitical adversary committed the hacking of the DNC servers and the subsequent release of damaging information to WikiLeaks. But now we are told the effort to undermine our electoral system went directly to the top … Comrade Putin.

Certainly U.S. diplomats, and other government officials, familiar with Putin and his autocratic ways are not surprised.

That Russia could have been involved in trying to influence our presidential election without strongman Putin’s knowledge or active involvement was always a stretch … almost on a par with bully Chris Christie not knowing about, or somehow being involved in, the George Washington Bridge lane closures. What underlings would dare take such actions without the big boss’s approval?

And now what?

Both Democrats and Republicans are calling for a formal investigation. Some think Congress is up to the task while others are calling for an independent probe to avoid the potential stink of partisanship.

Whatever form an investigation takes, there is no way results will be known until after January 20, 2017 … when Donald J. Trump will be sworn in as our nation’s 45th president.

A small group of Electoral College electors (10) has asked U.S. intelligence officials for more information on Russian interference in our election and any ongoing investigations surrounding Donald Trump’s relationship with Russia. They have asked that the information be given them ahead of their Dec. 19 meeting to formally vote for the next president.

Whether or not the electors get the information requested, they need to approach their Constitutional duty with the utmost seriousness … namely, by rejecting a man who appears to have been placed into office through the aid of a foreign enemy, at best, or the potential treason on the part of the Trump campaign, at worst.

The future of our great country, and that of the world, is now in the hands of 538 individuals. God help us.

Photo | AP Photo/Andrew Harnik

Filed Under: featured, Opinion

Donald Trump’s Twitter Diplomacy

December 5, 2016 By John DeProspo 4 Comments

22-donald-trump-rudy-giuliani-w600-h315-2x

One of the most important jobs in any presidential administration is that of Secretary of State. The holder of that position serves as America’s top diplomat around the world and the job is often held by those hoping to use the post as a springboard to higher office at some point in their careers. An argument could be made that the job is the most important cabinet position since whoever holds the office is fourth in the line of presidential succession.

President-elect Donald Trump has yet to name his choice for Secretary of State. A number of interesting names have been floated as possible picks: Rudy Giuliani, John Bolton, Bob Corker, Mitt Romney, Jon Huntsman and retired General David Patraeus.

But as important as the job may be from an historical perspective, we are now living in strange times. A TV celebrity, with no governing experience, whose only foreign policy goal seems to be how best to promote his business interests, will soon be occupying the White House

Some political observers are wondering if the position of Secretary of State will be as critical in a Trump administration as in days past. In fact, one Republican analyst, Ana Navarro, has observed the nation no longer needs a Secretary of State.

Navarro tweeted: “Let’s stop obsessing over who’ll be Secretary of State. We don’t need one. Our Twitter-in-Chief can set foreign policy in 140 characters.”

As amusing as Navarro’s comment may be, it is painfully very close to the truth.

We may be looking at the first president who will conduct his foreign policy by way of social media. It is very possible the main function for the next Secretary of State will be to put out diplomatic fires initiated by a Trump tweet.

Who would want such a job? Certainly not any one in their right mind!

Only a diehard Trump flunky could possible consider such a thankless, seemingly impossible, job. Only someone who has spent a lot of time defending Trumpism, in all its shades of inanity, would be willing to humiliate himself on an international stage.

It looks very likely our next Secretary of State will be “Mayor 9-11” himself … by default.

Also, Giuliani has been accused of not bing in his right mind for quite some time.

Photo | nymag.com

 

 

 

Filed Under: featured, Opinion

Could Trump Presidency Mark End Of Political Satire?

December 1, 2016 By John DeProspo 7 Comments

1438177031_donald-trump-sarah-palin-zoomNot too long ago, when the idea of a president-elect Donald Trump seemed as remote as a manned-mission to Neptune, political writers had a field day satirizing what a Trump administration would look like. I plead guilty to the sinful pleasure of having put out a list of potential Trump cabinet picks. (Confident Trump Lining Up Cabinet)

Invariably, Sarah Palin made almost every satirist’s list for secretary of something … State, or perhaps, Education?

Just the thought of Palin as the head of any of the 15 executive departments was a hoot in its shear absurdity.

Now, a close Palin aide and a top Donald Trump transition official have told ABC News Sarah Palin is seriously being considered for secretary of veterans affairs. The Department of Veterans Affairs just happens to be the largest government agency, with over 300,000 federal employees and a budget of $182 billion for 2017.

As crazy as it may seem having the half-term, half-witted Alaska governor run such as massive enterprise, the news is no joke. This is not satire.

It appears Palin’s main qualification for the job is that her son, Track, spent a year deployed in Iraq with the U.S. Army. You may recall it was Track Palin who got busted for drunken domestic abuse only to be defended by “Mama Grizzly” who blamed the incident on his PTSD … and President Obama, of course!

So the woman who, as John McCain’s 2008 VP pick, thought she was qualified in foreign affairs because she could see Russia from her backyard now thinks she is experienced to run the largest governmental agency because her son served one year in the military?

But more importantly, what would such an appointment say about the judgment and competency of the soon to be President Trump?

It is safe to say veterans do not see this news as humorous.

With a Trump administration, we may soon be witnessing the end of humor as a means to ridicule and expose political stupidity.

From hereon in, don’t assume a headline such as this: “Trump Pardons Bernie Madoff And Picks Him To Run Treasury Department” is meant as political parody.

Fact-checking will never be more important.

Photo | usmagazine.com

 

Filed Under: featured, Opinion

The Media Has Become The New Hillary Clinton

November 23, 2016 By John DeProspo 6 Comments

bill_of_rights

During his presidential run, Donald Trump was able to successfully brand Hillary Clinton as “Crooked Hillary.” Now that he no longer has his former opponent to stir up his faithful followers, he is aiming his ire at the crooked media.

And there is no news outlet more hated by Trump than The New York Times.

A few days ago, the “King of the Tweets” was at his media-bashing best when he denounced The New York Times as a “failing” institution that covered him inaccurately — “and with a nasty tone!”

Yesterday, instead of holding a post-election press conference as has been the custom of a president-elect, Trump invited major media bigwigs for a private, off-the-record meeting at his gold-plated lair on Fifth Avenue. According to many who attended, the meeting did not go well.

“It was like a f−−−ing firing squad,” one source said of the encounter.

“Trump kept saying, ‘We’re in a room of liars, the deceitful, dishonest media who got it all wrong.’ He addressed everyone in the room, calling the media dishonest, deceitful liars. He called out Jeff Zucker by name and said everyone at CNN was a liar, and CNN was [a] network of liars,” the source said.

Trump’s distrust for the media is best reflected in the fact that he has not held a press conference since July. Many analysts are predicting once Trump takes over the Oval Office, he will emulate his political idol, Vladimir Putin. It is the Russian autocrat’s custom to give a press conference just once a year… and the Russian media is thrilled with that small crumb!

What Trump is doing by vilifying an independent press is standard fare for autocrats. Like his peers in Argentina, Turkey, Ecuador, Venezuela and Russia, Trump views a free media as something to be crushed. He tells his supporters it represents the corrupt elites, both inside and outside the country. But the truth is a free media represents a threat to his power.

The media is now the new enemy of the people. The rallying cry has gone from “Crooked Hillary” to the “Crooked Media.” Any media outlet that has the temerity to print negative articles about our new tyrant … I mean president … runs the risk of Trump’s wrath!

Maybe he will threaten to sue? If history is any guide, that idle threat just might placate his diehard sycophants.

But sorry Don, our great country was founded on freedom of speech and the corresponding democrat bulwark of freedom of the press. We are not a third word country that lacks the institutions to put you in your place… or out of office.

Photo | theimaginativeconservative

 

Filed Under: featured, Opinion

Donald Trump, Fake News And The Death Of “The Truth”

November 19, 2016 By John DeProspo 5 Comments

23f6232

Anyone who has ever witnessed a courtroom trial is familiar with the question: “Do you swear to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth?” It is the oath a witness is sworn to take before being asked to testify. Discovering “the truth,” after all, is the basic goal of our judicial system. If a witness, under oath, lies to the court, they can be found guilty of perjury and sentenced to jail time. “The truth” reigns supreme inside the halls of justice.

But outside the courthouse? “The truth” has come under serious assault.

Thanks to the candidacy of Donald Trump, “ the truth” no longer has the primacy it once had. Thanks to fake news sources and the increasing popularity of social media such as Facebook, “the truth” is whatever a writer wants it to be.

One would think that in the age of the Internet and Google, “the truth” would be such an easy thing to ascertain. But as we are seeing, many Americans are too lazy to do their homework. It is much easier to believe a favored politician, or “news source,” than to do some fact-checking of one’s own.

Just yesterday, Vice President-elect Mike Pence was booed at a Broadway play. The cast of the hit musical Hamilton asked Pence, who was sitting in the audience of their show, to make sure both he and Trump safeguard their constitutional rights.

As soon as Trump got wind of the situation, he immediately took to his bully pulpit, otherwise known as Twitter, and condemned the cast for their “rude” speech:

“Our wonderful future V.P. Mike Pence was harassed last night at the theater by the cast of Hamilton, cameras blazing. This should not happen!”

“The Theater must always be a safe and special place. The cast of Hamilton was very rude last night to a very good man, Mike Pence. Apologize!”  

Now if someone were to take Trump’s words as “true,” without reading what was actually said, they might come away thinking a Broadway theater is no place to attack an incoming vice president. They would rightly be angry with those liberal performers for embarrassing the “good man.”

But if those Trump believers were to dig into the situation just a little, they would see a completely different picture. Here is what was actually said to Pence … a far cry from “rude” speech:

“Vice President-elect Pence, we welcome you and we truly thank you for joining us at ‘Hamilton: An American Musical.’ ”

“We are the diverse America who are alarmed and anxious that your new administration will not protect us, our planet, our children, our parents, or defend us and uphold our inalienable rights, sir. We hope this show has inspired you to uphold our American values and work on behalf of all of us.”

We are truly entering dangerous times if “the truth” is only respected and revered in a court of law under penalty of perjury.

Photo | linkedin.com

 

Filed Under: featured, Opinion

Remember When It Was Going To Be Bush vs. Clinton?

November 15, 2016 By John DeProspo 6 Comments

clinton-hillery-bush-jebb

At the start of the 2016 presidential race, there was widespread speculation our nation was headed towards a contest between two political dynasties. It was going to be Bush vs. Clinton. But this time it would be Jeb Bush taking on Hillary Clinton.

The Republican and Democratic establishments seemed to have had their dream matchup. Jeb Bush was the moderate conservative and the only twice-elected governor of the important swing state of Florida. Hillary Clinton was the Democrat with the most political experience having served as First Lady, New York senator for two terms and Secretary of State.

In a wide-open primary, Republicans fielded a team of 17 mostly experienced, career politicians. But neither the establishment favorite, Jeb Bush, nor any of the other “Inside the Beltway” types caught on with the Republican base quite like the outsider Donald Trump.

Trump talked about the corruption and incompetence within our political system. He told voters he was the only one who could fix the mess in Washington D.C. because he alone was above “politics as usual.” He would be a president beholden to no one as he, a billionaire, was self-funding his campaign.

Though they tried to thwart his presidential run, we know Trump went on to obliterate his competition in the primary and was selected the Republican Party’s presidential nominee at their convention in July.

The Democrats, on the other hand, only had five candidates seeking their party’s presidential nomination. Clinton was such an odds-on favorite of becoming the Democratic Party’s nominee that only Bernie Sanders, Martin O’Malley, Jim Webb and Lincoln Chafee challenged the heir apparent. The Democratic contest soon turned into Clinton versus Sanders.

Unlike the level playing field on the Republican side, the Democratic Party was hell-bent on seeing their favored candidate, Hillary Clinton, win the primary. Hacked emails from the Democratic National Committee (DNC), published by Wikileaks, showed chairwoman, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, and her committee members doing all they could to stymie Sanders and tilt the nomination towards Clinton.

As their primary dragged on, the Republican Party reluctantly learned the presidential contest of 2016 was shaping up as a “change election.” There was no stopping what their voting base wanted. And they wanted the political maverick, Donald Trump.

The Democrats didn’t realize, or want to acknowledge, a revolution was also taking place with their very own party. The wild enthusiasm generated by Bernie Sanders was a clear signal that liberals and progressives were also sick of politics as usual.

Could the Democratic Party have nominated someone more of a political insider than Hillary Clinton? A person who has been a political figure on the national stage for nearly 25 years? Justly or not, with Clinton it seemed like one scandal after another. As a result, her unfavorability ratings almost matched Trump’s.

A large chunk of the Democratic base tried to tell their party they were suffering from “Clinton fatigue.” But no one was listening. Many Democrats were so offended by the DNC playing favorites in the primary that they vowed to either skip the election, vote third party or vote Trump. But no one took them seriously.

Democrats are quick to point out that Trump’s presidency is a product of the Republican’s own evil doings.

The truth is that by pushing a deeply flawed candidate like Hillary Clinton from the get go, and then thwarting the growing momentum of the Sanders’ revolution, President Trump is as much a creation of the Democratic Party.

Photo | yalibnan.com

 

 

Filed Under: featured, Opinion

God Bless Ruth Bader Ginsburg!

November 14, 2016 By John DeProspo 4 Comments

2016-09-16-justice-ginsburg-0236-edit_custom-9459e305991d0ac362fe6b76459bcaf2b657d2bf-s800-c85

Unless something dramatic happens within the coming weeks, President Donald Trump will be appointing the next Supreme Court justice. The GOP’s gamble of blocking President Obama’s constitutional right, and duty, to fill the seat of the late Antonin Scalia, vacant since February, will have paid off big time.

There is no doubt Republicans will look to nominate the most conservative justice they can find. The Court, currently split between four conservative and four liberal justices, will once again tilt rightward.

During the presidential election, Democrats tried turning the future makeup of the Supreme Court into a major campaign issue. The warnings could not have been any direr. The next president, voters were told, could nominate 1-3 new justices. If those justices were all in the mold of Antonin Scalia, the Supreme Court could stay firmly conservative for decades.

Yes, things look bad for all those who had hoped for a President Clinton and the appointment of liberal justices to the High Court. But all is not as bad as it seems.

President Trump might only appoint one new justice.

The oldest Supreme Court justice is Ruth Bader Ginsburg at 83 years of age. She is followed by Justice Anthony Kennedy, at 80, and Justice Stephen Breyer, at 78.

As the most senior jurist, many liberals had hoped Ruth Bader Ginsburg would step down during Obama’s presidency in order for him to appoint a like-minded liberal justice. But the woman otherwise known as “The Notorious RBG” was having none of it.

Not a big fan of Donald Trump, it’s a safe bet her resolve to remain on the bench has only stiffened. Not that she has expressed thoughts of retiring anytime soon.

“I will retire when it’s time,” the feisty 83 year-old has said. “And, when is it time? When I can’t do the job full-steam.”

Looking at averages, the last 10 justices to depart the Supreme Court had an average age of nearly 80, though John Paul Stevens skewed this average upward when he stepped down in 2010 at the ripe old age of 90.

But looking at, and listening to, the liberal icon, there is nothing average about Ruth Bader Ginsburg. There is little reason to believe her retirement will take place before the next Democratic president sits in the Oval Office… if then!

Photo | Ariel Zambelich/NPR

 

 

Filed Under: featured, Opinion

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • …
  • 22
  • Next Page »

Recent Posts

What If Trump Had Not Accepted Biden’s Offer For An Early Debate?

Many political analysts love to talk about the two pivotal moments in the 2024 … [Read More...]

  • Republicans Sound The Alarm: Harris Administration Could Threaten to Pass Laws Most Americans Actually Want
  • Some Republicans Worried Country Not Ready to Elect First Convicted Felon as President
  • The GOP Is Stuck With Two Losers

Follow us online

  • Facebook

Advertisements

Navigation

  • About Us
  • Show Your Support
  • Guest Posts
  • Great Links
  • Contact

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Copyright © 2025 The Daily Nooze.com. All Rights Reserved. "All the news we deem fit to print"™